Stay Connected


Search The Screening Log
Ads
Ads
• Follow us on
« 'Taken' scores big at Friday box office | Main | Mickey Rourke in talks to join 'Broken Horses' »
Saturday
31Jan2009

Review: "Taken"

Seen on: January 30, 2009

The players: Director: Pierre Morel, Writer: Robert Mark Kamen, Luc Besson, Cast: Liam Neeson, Maggie Grace, Anjul Nigam, Goran Kostic, Holly Valance

Facts of interest: Morel's next is "From Paris With Love" with John Travolta.

The plot: Liam Neeson stars as a former government operative who stops at nothing to find his daughter and free her from her kidnappers.

Our thoughts: Liam Neeson goes all Jason Bourne and Jack Bauer on us in Pierre Morel’s fast-paced action thriller “Taken,” and to be honest, watching him eliminate bad guy after bad guy for nearly 93 minutes is plenty of fun.

That said, “Taken” is certainly not a perfect film. The story line has its flaws and is totally unrealistic, the characters lack depth and aren’t really memorable, and even the movie’s ending isn’t as vibrant as I expected it to be.

Now, if this were a boring film, I would probably spend quite some time complaining about all these issues, but considering “Taken” is incredibly entertaining and even decently suspenseful, I cannot help but praise Morel’s efforts.

Written by Luc Besson and Robert Mark Kamen, the movie introduces us to Bryan Mills (Neeson), a former government operative who faces the longest 96 hours of his life when his beloved daughter Kim (Maggie Grace) gets kidnapped during a vacation stay in Paris.

But Bryan is a real professional, and you better not want to mess with him… ever! Determined to hunt down and kill the bastards who took his daughter, Bryan quickly puts the pieces of the puzzle together and travels to Paris to take his personal, bloody revenge.


And wow… does he kick butt with style! As I already mentioned above, Bryan is like a mix between Bourne and Bauer. Not only is he unrealistically smart and always a step ahead of his enemies, but he also shows absolutely no scruples about killing without mercy.

No matter what tricky situation he ends up in, Bryan always finds a quick way out, and following him on his quest to track down a bunch ruthless kidnappers all across Paris ends up being a wildly absorbing experience. None of this is at all credible, but it’s darn enjoyable to watch.

Neeson is undoubtedly the perfect man for this badass role, and the character of the unbeatable hero suits him very well. I mean, how can you not cheer for a guy who easily locates untraceable criminals and takes out a whole army of armed gangsters at once without even breaking a sweat.

Freaky quote: “I don't know what you want. If you are looking for ransom, I can tell you I don't have money. But what I do have are a very particular set of skills; skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you." – Liam Neeson

The final word: If you’re willing to ignore the film’s few flaws, you should have no trouble enjoying “Taken” to the fullest extent. Morel’s direction is a little too Paul Greengrass-like at times, but he does a fabulous job at keeping his plot operating at full speed throughout.

“Taken” is an explosive thriller that will keep you engaged until the very end.

Article by Franck Tabouring

Reader Comments (2)

Although I like the main character's actor I should say that the rest of the stuff I've seen in this movie is dreadful at least.

The movie is so based on vulgar Hollywood's templates of bad and good guys; of a teenager girl, acting like an imbecile; of how good guys are being hurt but are grabbing their butts and fighting back. And of course the good guy has to fight bad guys driving all-times-best Jeep SUV.

Also a business is totally inhumane; corrupted Euro-police is so on their side; only US gov's dude (which happens to be a good and carrying father, despite his 'never being there for the family and serving people' job description) is capable of stopping such a shameless cartel. Et cetera.

However something new got on the surface: now good guys are allowed to torture the bad ones. And no wonder where the skills were acquired: the good dude is former spy. What a twist!

A perverted producer/director of the movie doesn't think that simply killing the crooks is enough now: they have to suffer before hand. Is it the vapors of Guantanamo that clouding their brains?

In short: the movie is full of politicized crap, nonsenses, and foul movie stamps.

February 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterCos

This movie was absolutely terrible. It proves that it's very difficult to make a good movie out of a bad script. you can read our review over at themovingarts.com

March 19, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterEric

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>